NYSCHSAA Individual Rankings: 10-05

This is the release of the updated Catholic High School Athletic Association’s individual rankings…The rankings, compiled by the CHSAA committee, reflect all of the action that has taken place up to January 27th…These rankings were provided to LHW by CHSAA chairperson, Chris Alfalla. They are for entertainment purposes only and should not be a cause of argument..Enjoy ! Continue reading “NYSCHSAA Individual Rankings: 10-05”

Section VIII Individual Rankings 10-05

This is the Fifth release of the Section VIII (Nassau County) individual rankings.

This is the Fifth release of the Section VIII (Nassau County) individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 1/23/2010. The number in square brackets [#] indicates the rank of the wrestler in the previous ranking. Continue reading “Section VIII Individual Rankings 10-05”

Section II Individual Rankings 10-04

This is release four of New York State section II’s individual wrestling rankings.

This is the Fourth release of the Section II individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 1/21/2010. The number enclosed in brackets [#] after each name indcates the rank of the wrestler in the previous release. Continue reading “Section II Individual Rankings 10-04”

Section VIII Individual Rankings 10-04

This is the Fourth release of the Section VIII (Nassau County) individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 1/16/2010. [#] indicates the rank of the wrestler in the previous release. Continue reading “Section VIII Individual Rankings 10-04”

CHSAA Individual Rankings: 10-04

This is the release of the updated Catholic High School Athletic Association’s individual rankings…The rankings, compiled by the CHSAA committee, reflect all of the action that has taken place up to January 20th…These rankings were provided to LHW by CHSAA chairperson, Chris Alfalla. They are for entertainment purposes only and should not be a cause of argument..Enjoy ! Continue reading “CHSAA Individual Rankings: 10-04”

New York State Individual Rankings 10-04

This is the second release of the New York State high school individual wrestling rankings for the 2009-2010 season.

This the first release of the New York State Individual rankings. Both DI and DII wrestlers are ranked. Continue reading “New York State Individual Rankings 10-04”

Section XI Individual Rankings 10-03

This is the third release of the Section XI (Suffolk County) individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 1/13/2010.

This is the third release of the Section XI (Suffolk County) individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 1/13/2010. The number in square brackets indicates the wrestler’s previous rank. If a wrestler was moved to a new weight class, he is indicated as Not Ranked in the new weight class. Continue reading “Section XI Individual Rankings 10-03”

Section II Individual Rankings 10-03

This is the second release of the sectionII individual rankings for 2009-2010. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 1/11/2010.

This is the second release of the Section II individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 1/11/2010. A number in square brackets indicates former rank ([#]). Continue reading “Section II Individual Rankings 10-03”

CHSAA Individual Rankings: 10-03

This is the release of the updated Catholic High School Athletic Association’s individual rankings

This is the release of the updated Catholic High School Athletic Association’s individual rankings…The rankings, compiled by the CHSAA committee, reflect all of the action that has taken place up to January 11th…These rankings were provided to LHW by CHSAA chairperson, Chris Alfalla. They are for entertainment purposes only and should not be a cause of argument..Enjoy ! Continue reading “CHSAA Individual Rankings: 10-03”

Section VIII Individual Rankings 10-03

This is the Third release of the Section VIII (Nassau County) individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed as of 1/7/2010.

This is the Third release of the Section VIII (Nassau County) individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed as of 1/7/2010. Included with this ranking is a PDF of all the bout results for each weight class.  ( Section 8 Wrestling Results) If you find the rankings don’t reflect the correct standings, please take the time to identify the results in the link that suggests a different rank with your comment. Continue reading “Section VIII Individual Rankings 10-03”

Section II Individual Rankings 10-02

This is the first release of the Section II individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 1/2/2010.

This is the first release of the Section II individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 1/2/2010. Continue reading “Section II Individual Rankings 10-02”

Section XI Individual Rankings 10-02

This is the third release of the Section XI (Suffolk County) individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 1/2/2010.

This is the third release of the Section XI (Suffolk County) individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 1/2/2010. Continue reading “Section XI Individual Rankings 10-02”

Section XI Individual Rankings 10-01

This is the second release of the Section XI (Suffolk County) individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 12/23/2009.

This is the second release of the Section XI (Suffolk County) individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 12/23/2009. Continue reading “Section XI Individual Rankings 10-01”

Section VIII Individual Rankings 10-01

This is the second release of the Section VIII (Nassau County) indiducal rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 12/23/2009.

This is the second release of the Section VIII (Nassau County) individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 12/23/2009. Continue reading “Section VIII Individual Rankings 10-01”

Section VIII Individual Rankings 09-48

This is a baseline Section VIII (Nassau County) ranking for the 2009/2010 season. Preseason rankings are generally way off. They serve as a starting point for discussion around weights and competition.

This is a baseline Section VIII (Nassau County) ranking for the 2009/2010 season.  Preseason rankings are generally way off.  They serve as a starting point for discussion around weights and competition.  Please treat it as such.  All constructive comments are welcome. Continue reading “Section VIII Individual Rankings 09-48”

Section XI Individual Rankings 09-48

This is a baseline Section XI (Suffolk County) ranking for the 2009/2010 season. Preseason rankings are generally way off. They serve as a starting point for discussion around weights, returning wrestlers, and competition.

This is a baseline Section XI (Suffolk County) ranking for the 2009/2010 season. Preseason rankings are generally way off. They serve as a starting point for discussion around weights, returning wrestlers, and competition. Please treat it as such. All constructive comments are welcome. Continue reading “Section XI Individual Rankings 09-48”

2010 NCAA DI Dual Meet Top-25 Ranking and Top-10 Analysis

While a team can place highly at the NCAA championships on the strength of a handful of qualifiers, as Maryland demonstrated last season by placing 10th with four, to break the top 10 in dual meets a team must have an outstanding wrestler at every weight. And unlike tournament success, dual meet success mostly falls on the shoulders of the faces who will debut this season.

NCAA 2010 Wrestling Championship LogoWhile a team can place highly at the NCAA championships on the strength of a handful of qualifiers, as Maryland demonstrated last season by placing 10th with four, to break the top 10 in dual meets a team must have an outstanding wrestler at every weight. And unlike tournament success, dual meet success mostly falls on the shoulders of the faces who will debut this season. Continue reading “2010 NCAA DI Dual Meet Top-25 Ranking and Top-10 Analysis”

NCAA DI Individual Wrestler Power Ranking for 2009-2010

The top 25 NCAA Division I wrestlers eligible to compete in the 2010 season have been ranked across weight classes. A power ranking formula was created to compare performance. No subjective information was used to rank the wrestlers except for arriving at the power point system which was applied the same for each wrestler.

Military StripesThe top 25 NCAA Division I wrestlers eligible to compete in the 2009-2010 season have been ranked across weight classes. A power ranking formula was created to compare performance. No subjective information was used to rank the wrestlers except for arriving at the power point system which was applied the same for each wrestler.

The formula weighs the following factors for each wrestler:

Section XI Dual Meet Team Rankings for 2009-2010

All Section XI Division I teams are ranked for dual meet competitiveness for the 2009-2010 season. To rank the teams, the following factors were taken into consideration.

nassaurank2All Section XI Division I teams are ranked for dual meet competitiveness for the 2009-2010 season. To rank the teams, the following factors were taken into consideration. Continue reading “Section XI Dual Meet Team Rankings for 2009-2010”

Section XI Tournament Team Rankings for 2009-2010

All Section XI Division I teams are ranked for tournament competitiveness for the 2009-2010 season.

nyslogoAll Section XI Division I teams are ranked for tournament competitiveness for the 2009-2010 season. To rank the teams, the following factors were taken into consideration. Continue reading “Section XI Tournament Team Rankings for 2009-2010”

2010 NCAA DI Tournament Predictions and Team Rank

As the 2009-2010 wrestling season approaches, teams are planning and strategizing how they can improve upon last season’s performance, break into the top ten, or even vie for a title. But as Helmuth Von Moltke, a 19th century Prussian Field Marshall, is famed for saying, “no battle plan survives contact with the enemy.” While each team develops and works their plan, for sure their fierce competitors will have something to say about it.

NCAA 2010 Wrestling Championship LogoAs the 2009-2010 wrestling season approaches, teams are planning and strategizing how they can improve upon last season’s performance, break into the top ten, or even vie for a title.  But as Helmuth Von Moltke, a 19th century Prussian Field Marshall, is famed for saying, “no battle plan survives contact with the enemy.”   While each team develops and works their plan, for sure their fierce competitors will have something to say about it.  Continue reading “2010 NCAA DI Tournament Predictions and Team Rank”

Section VIII Tournament Team Rankings for 2009-2010

All Section VIII Division I teams are ranked for tournament competitiveness for the 2009-2010 season.

nassaurank2All Section VIII Division I teams are ranked for tournament competitiveness for the 2009-2010 season. To rank the teams, the following factors were taken into consideration. Continue reading “Section VIII Tournament Team Rankings for 2009-2010”

Section VIII Dual Meet Team Rankings for 2009-2010

All Section VIII Division I teams are ranked for dual meet competitiveness for the 2009-2010 season.

nassaurank2All Section VIII Division I teams are ranked for dual meet competitiveness for the 2009-2010 season.  To rank the teams, the following factors were taken into consideration.

  • Returning all-county place winners were evaluated.
  • Returning qualifier place winners were evaluated.
  • Section performance of returning wrestlers held preference when number of returning qualifiers were similar.
  • Teams with more returning section qualifiers were given higher preference than teams with less.

Continue reading “Section VIII Dual Meet Team Rankings for 2009-2010”

2009-2010 New York State DII Power Ranking

The top 25 Division II All-State Wrestlers have been identified using a power ranking formula to compare performance across weight classes. No subjective information was used to rank the wrestlers except for arriving at the power point system which was applied the same for each wrestler.

The top 25 Division II All-State Wrestlers have been identified using a power ranking formula to compare performance across weight classes. No subjective information was used to rank the wrestlers except for arriving at the power point system which was applied the same for each wrestler. Continue reading “2009-2010 New York State DII Power Ranking”

2009-2010 New York State DI Power Ranking

A power ranking of the top 25 New York State Division I high school wrestlers for the 2009/2010 season. A power ranking formula was used to compare performance across weight classes.

A power ranking of the top 25 New York State Division I high school wrestlers for the 2009/2010 season.  A power ranking formula was used to compare performance across weight classes. No subjective information was used to rank the wrestlers except for arriving at the power point system which was applied the same for each wrestler. Continue reading “2009-2010 New York State DI Power Ranking”

2009-2010 New York State Power Rankings (DI & D2)

A power ranking of the top 25 high school wrestlers in New York state for the 2009/2010 season, both DI and DII wrestlers are included in the ranking. A power ranking formula was used to compare performance across weight classes. No subjective information was used to rank the wrestlers except for arriving at the power point system which was applied the same for each wrestler.

A power ranking of the top 25 high school wrestlers in New York state for the 2009/2010 season, both DI and DII wrestlers are included in the ranking. A power ranking formula was used to compare performance across weight classes. No subjective information was used to rank the wrestlers except for arriving at the power point system which was applied the same for each wrestler. Continue reading “2009-2010 New York State Power Rankings (DI & D2)”