This is the Seventh and final release of the Section VIII (Nassau County) individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the weight classes they competed at in their qualifying tournaments.

This is the third release of the New York State Individual rankings. Both DI and DII wrestlers are ranked.

This is the Fifth release of the Section II individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 1/30/2010.

This is the release of the updated Catholic High School Athletic Association’s individual rankings…The rankings, compiled by the CHSAA committee, reflect all of the action that has taken place up to February 3rd…These rankings were …

This is the Sixth release of the Section VIII (Nassau County) individual rankings for the 2009-2010 season.

This is the release of the updated Nassau/Suffolk Catholic High School Athletic Association’s individual rankings…The rankings, compiled by the CHSAA committee, reflect all of the action that has taken place up to January 27th…These rankings were …

This is the release of the updated Catholic High School Athletic Association’s individual rankings…The rankings, compiled by the CHSAA committee, reflect all of the action that has taken place up to January 27th…These rankings were …

This is the Fifth release of the Section VIII (Nassau County) individual rankings.

This is release four of New York State section II’s individual wrestling rankings.

This is the Fourth release of the Section VIII (Nassau County) individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 1/16/2010. [#] indicates the rank …

This is the release of the updated Catholic High School Athletic Association’s individual rankings…The rankings, compiled by the CHSAA committee, reflect all of the action that has taken place up to January 20th…These rankings were …

This is the second release of the New York State high school individual wrestling rankings for the 2009-2010 season.

This is the third release of the Section XI (Suffolk County) individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 1/13/2010.

This is the second release of the sectionII individual rankings for 2009-2010. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 1/11/2010.

This is the release of the updated Catholic High School Athletic Association’s individual rankings

This is the Third release of the Section VIII (Nassau County) individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed as of 1/7/2010.

This is the first release of the Section II individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 1/2/2010.

This is the third release of the Section XI (Suffolk County) individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 1/2/2010.

This is the second release of the Section XI (Suffolk County) individual rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 12/23/2009.

This is the second release of the Section VIII (Nassau County) indiducal rankings. Wrestlers have been ranked at the lowest weight class where they competed at in results as of 12/23/2009.

This is a baseline Section VIII (Nassau County) ranking for the 2009/2010 season. Preseason rankings are generally way off. They serve as a starting point for discussion around weights and competition.

This is a baseline Section XI (Suffolk County) ranking for the 2009/2010 season. Preseason rankings are generally way off. They serve as a starting point for discussion around weights, returning wrestlers, and competition.

While a team can place highly at the NCAA championships on the strength of a handful of qualifiers, as Maryland demonstrated last season by placing 10th with four, to break the top 10 in dual meets a team must have an outstanding wrestler at every weight. And unlike tournament success, dual meet success mostly falls on the shoulders of the faces who will debut this season.

The top 25 NCAA Division I wrestlers eligible to compete in the 2010 season have been ranked across weight classes. A power ranking formula was created to compare performance. No subjective information was used to rank the wrestlers except for arriving at the power point system which was applied the same for each wrestler.

All Section XI Division I teams are ranked for dual meet competitiveness for the 2009-2010 season. To rank the teams, the following factors were taken into consideration.

All Section XI Division I teams are ranked for tournament competitiveness for the 2009-2010 season.